Objective
Label | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
"4 per 1000" Dashboard | Provide a "4 per 1000" dashboard delivering near real-time quantitative information on the progress of the Initiative | A "4 per 1000" dashboard delivering near real-time information on the progress of the Initiative, considering Partners and Members and their actions, is available. |
Targets
Baseline 2020 | Target 2030 | Target 2050 |
---|---|---|
Annual reports are available. | By the end of 2022, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) will be established. By the end of 2023, the dashboard will be operational and regularly updated. | The "4 per 1000" dashboard is operational, regularly updated and recognized as an international standard. |
Activities
N° | Activity | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | Define targets and indicators | Collect targets, normalize similar targets, and assign priorities to each target (high, medium, low). |
2 | Elaborate system requirements | Define the system requirements to achieve the targets, and assign priorities for each requirement (high, medium, low). |
3 | Develop the system | Develop updated versions of the system in short iterations and ensure continuous testing. |
4 | Manage the data | Prepare and manage appropriate data. |
5 | Report on activities | Keep stakeholders involved and actively inform them about the progress of the Initiative. |
Problem
Problem Statement | Description | Consequences |
---|---|---|
Lack of transparency regarding the progress of the Initiative | Due to the numerous activities of the Initiative in various fields of action, it is hard to keep track of the achievements and the progress made by the Initiative. | Acceptance among stakeholders diminishes, and the benefit of the Initiative will be questioned. |
Causes
N° | Cause | Description - explanation |
---|---|---|
1 | Insufficient reporting | Progress reports are insufficiently prepared and distributed. |
2 | Missing dashboard | There is no easy-to-use tool to access the results and progress of the Initiative. |
3 | Dashboard difficult-to-use | Due to complicated usability dashboard is accessed by experts only. |
4 | KPIs not visible | Too many indicators resp. Essential indicators are hard to distinguish. |
5 | Inadequate server infrastructure | Availability and response time of server infrastructure is not sufficient. |
6 | Unattractive information provided | The information is complex for users to understand or is in an unattractive format. |
7 | Lack of standardized data | The database used to feed the dashboard might be derived from non-standardized data and methods. |
Critical Success Factors (CSFs)
N° | Critical Success Factor | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | Easy-to-use dashboard | The dashboard has an easily accessible, user-friendly interface on PCs, notebooks, and mobile devices. |
2 | Prioritization of KPIs | Put the most important global KPIs (key performance indicators) on the front page, allow to drill down into more detail, and access KPIs with lower importance. |
3 | Personalization of the user interface | Participants will have different fields of interest, and the importance of KPIs will differ according to that. Therefore, the front page should be adaptable to the user's requirements. |
4 | Short response times | Fast data extraction and preparation. Instantaneous filtering and drilling into tons of data. |
5 | Active reporting | Regular progress reports are distributed by e-mail; content is adaptable to user requirements. |
6 | Information of interest to users | Information should be of interest to users and be quick and easy to read. |
Barriers
N° | Barrier | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | Cost | The cost of the dashboard's development, maintenance, and operation is underestimated. |
2 | Requirements unclear | Requirements are not widely analyzed and not broadly based. |
3 | Lack of acceptance | The acceptance will diminish when the platform is not sufficiently user-friendly and stable. |
4 | Different stakeholder interests | Stakeholders are diverse, and each has different interests. |