FASP Workflow

1. The project holder completes and submits an online FASP Request - Form

1. Check if the request meets the defined eligibility criteria
   1. Request is complete
   2. Organization exists
   3. The project must contribute to at least one of the objectives of the "4 per 1000" Strategy
2. Decide if the request is admitted or not
   1. If yes, proceed with P60
   2. If not, proceed with P70

P80

P330

1. Upload Project Documents (mandatory for planned and ongoing projects)
2. Complete Concept Note (mandatory only for projects in the conception phase)
3. Complete XXXX FASP Questionnaire
4. Notify the Executive Secretariat once the information is complete

P90

P80,P100

1. Identify an Assessor

P130

Assess compliance with safeguard criteria

1. Review the provided information in 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3
2. Assesses compliance with the Safeguard criteria - XXXX STEP 1 - SAFEGUARD CRITERIA
3. For each criterion decide if the project meets the requirements:
   
   1. If the project does not meet the criterion, check “no” and briefly explain your decision
   2. If the project complies, check "yes" and briefly explain your decision
4. Proceed with Step 2 of the assessment

P160

Assess compliance with direct criteria

1. Review the provided information in 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5
2. Assesses compliance with the Direct Reference Criteria - XXXX STEP 2 - DIRECT REFERENCE CRITERIA
3. For each criterion decide if the project meets the requirements:
   
   1. If the project does not meet the criterion, check “no”, if applicable, and briefly explain your decision
   2. If the project complies, check "yes", if applicable, and briefly explain your decision
4. Proceed with Step 3 of the assessment

P190

Assess compliance with indirect criteria

1. Review the provided information in 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3
2. Assesses compliance with the Direct Reference Criteria - XXXX STEP 3 - INDIRECT REFERENCE CRITERIA
3. For each criterion
   1. decide if the project has a positive, negative, or no effect, check the corresponding box
   2. briefly explain your decision under "Effect on ...", and
   3. comment on the "Monitoring of ..." each criterion.
4. Proceed with Step 4 of the assessment

P220

Assess compliance with cross-cutting criteria

1. Review the provided information in 4.1 and 4.2
2. Assesses compliance with the Direct Reference Criteria - XXXX STEP 4 - CROSS-CUTTING REFERENCE CRITERIA
3. For each criterion
   1. decide if the project has a positive, negative, or no effect, check the corresponding box
   2. briefly explain your decision
4. Proceed with Step CONCLUSION of the assessment

P250

Elaborate assessment summary report

(deadline: 31.01.2025)

1. Complete the XXXX FASP - Summary
   1. Complete the assessment table
   2. Make a recommendation for each step
2. Decide if improvements should be made
   1. if yes, inform the Project Owner to study the XXXX FASP - Summary and review the corresponding project information and the answers in the FASP questionnaire
   2. if not, Inform the ExSec that the assessment was completed and request the validation.

1. Study the FASP summary
2. Review the corresponding project information
3. Review answers in the FASP questionnaire
4. Inform the Assessor to reassess project information and the information in the FASP questionnaire

1. Reassess project information
2. Reassess the information in the various steps of the FASP questionnaire and adjust ratings and comments accordingly
3. Adjust the assessment and recommendations in the FASP - Summary
4. Inform the ExSec that you have completed the assessment and request the validation

1. Review, improve, and validate the XXXX FASP - Summary
2. Decide if it needs further improvement by the Assessor or if we need to ask another STC member for a second opinion.
   1. if yes, notify the Assessor (P270)
   2. if not, identify potential opportunities for funding and collaboration and complete the XXXX FASP - Opportunities page
   3. make adjustments to the XXXX FASP - Status - YY, if required

1. Notify the Project Owner, send him the assessment summary report and the letter of support